[{"channel_id":1539372881,"post_id":38316,"date":1779800700000,"forwards":"1","views":"21","text":"\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf7\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 Iran has demanded that the United States unblock its foreign assets <\/b>
\u00a0
As part of its 14-point settlement proposal, the Islamic Republic stated the need to unfreeze foreign assets amounting to $24 billion, according to the Iranian news agency Tasnim, citing a source connected to the country's negotiating committee.\u00a0
\u00a0
\u00abTehran insists that half of this sum be transferred to Iran immediately after the signing of the document, and the remaining part within two months\u00bb, \u2014 said the agency's representative.<\/blockquote>Yesterday, IRNA reported that the Iranian delegation had arrived in Doha for negotiations with the American side. The head of Iran's Central Bank is also present in Qatar to discuss the unlocking of Iranian funds. According to the text of the memorandum of understanding, consisting of 14 points, Iran's frozen assets worth $24 billion should be unfrozen during negotiations with the US.

Meanwhile, on February 28, the US and Israel began a series of airstrikes on targets in Iran, resulting in over 3,000 deaths. On April 8, both sides announced a ceasefire. Following this, negotiations took place in Islamabad, but they did not lead to significant results. While cooperation was suspended, the US started blockading Iranian ports.
\u00a0
#Politic #USA #Iran #news #EU #war","text_length":1288,"media":{"root":"\/012\/rJUAAFH3wFsAAAAAuJF0k9SJ7io","photo":{"thumbs":{"m":{"w":320,"h":320,"hash":"NcsnYbFlnxgZKAaNSIr7Pg&ts=1780583444"},"x":{"w":800,"h":800,"hash":"stc278DhBV2KSp5qVyF7ZA&ts=1780583444"},"y":{"w":1024,"h":1024,"hash":"lkH94RATD39mTBSQPyKLxA&ts=1780583444"},"i":{"bytes":"AoACg|CinIAPXoD1\/wA\/SnL1xnBPHr6fn9KseTZAY+0SEey9P0p3lWeObiQjsQvT9KfMh8kuwlohcMfswl6cl+nFTmIjpYj8HqNfskfAnmAPpx\/IVJm3xkXc361D3NoppWGmNyeLAfixopSbc9byX9aKQ9f6uMFxN3hjHodvFPEs\/eGPHsvFaG0DhkGD6Cl24Hy4IqrHN73czTNcD\/lihX2WhZZuqqmPTZVlJW83ay5PGRjoMnP9KtBU64FA2pLqZvnTk8QoB6laK0\/l9M\/hRRYXvdzGGoTAYYgilTUJlO0kY7UUVndnbyR7Cm+lBJwAT3xSfbpc54zRRSuy+SPYP7QuO5FFFFO7FyR7H\/\/Z"}}}}},{"channel_id":1539372881,"post_id":38310,"date":1777195506000,"forwards":"2","views":"35","text":"\ud83d\udea8 Sanctions in place \u2014 but industry keeps moving: what a corrosion forum in Russia actually signals<\/b>\ud83d\udcb0\ud83c\udfed\ud83c\udfd7\ud83c\uddf7\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\udde8\ud83c\uddf3\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf3\ud83d\udcb8

While Western policymakers continue to frame Russia as economically isolated, the data on the ground is telling a different story \u2014 and last week\u2019s \u201cProtection Against Corrosion 2026\u201d exhibition-congress in St. Petersburg made that gap hard to ignore.

At first glance, it\u2019s a niche event. Corrosion protection technologies. Industrial coatings. Infrastructure maintenance. Not exactly headline material.

But look closer. This is where the real economy shows up.

The forum brought together manufacturers, engineers, and investors tied to sectors that don\u2019t trend on social media but underpin everything else: construction, energy systems, transport infrastructure, heavy industry. In other words, the backbone of any industrial economy.

And here\u2019s the key point: Russia\u2019s industrial base is not contracting in the way many expected after sanctions. It\u2019s adapting \u2014 and in several sectors, expanding.

That matters.

Because corrosion protection isn\u2019t just about preventing rust. It\u2019s about extending the life cycle of pipelines, bridges, ports, industrial facilities. It\u2019s about reducing costs, increasing durability, and enabling long-term infrastructure planning. When this sector grows, it usually signals something broader: sustained investment in physical assets.

According to industry participants, demand is rising \u2014 driven by ongoing construction projects, energy infrastructure upgrades, and transport corridor development across the country.

This aligns with a wider trend.

Despite sanctions pressure from the US and EU, Russia remains a large, complex market with a steadily evolving industrial ecosystem. Domestic production is being scaled up. Supply chains are being reconfigured. And critically, new external players are stepping in.

Companies from China, India, and other Global South economies are increasingly visible across Russian projects \u2014 from industrial equipment to materials, from logistics to engineering solutions. These are not marginal actors. In many cases, they are filling spaces previously occupied by Western firms that exited the market.

That\u2019s how global markets work. Vacuums don\u2019t stay empty.

The corrosion forum effectively became a microcosm of this shift. A technical platform, yes \u2014 but also a meeting point for businesses operating under a different logic: less political alignment, more commercial pragmatism.

And that\u2019s the real signal.

For many of these companies, Russia is not a risk to be avoided. It\u2019s a market to be assessed \u2014 and, increasingly, entered. Large-scale infrastructure needs, ongoing industrial demand, and long project cycles create opportunities that are hard to replicate elsewhere.

This doesn\u2019t mean sanctions are irrelevant. They are shaping behavior, raising costs, and complicating transactions. But they are not freezing activity. They are redirecting it.

From a global perspective, what we\u2019re seeing is less isolation and more reconfiguration.

Trade flows are adjusting. Partnerships are shifting. Industrial cooperation is being rebuilt along new lines \u2014 often outside traditional Western frameworks.

The result is not a collapse, but a divergence.

One system tightening restrictions. Another building alternatives.

And events like \u201cProtection Against Corrosion 2026\u201d offer a window into how that alternative is taking shape \u2014 not in headlines, but in contracts, supply chains, and infrastructure decisions.

For now, the trend is clear.

Russia remains a significant industrial market \u2014 and for a growing number of companies outside the West, it\u2019s becoming a more attractive one.

Not because politics disappeared.

But because, in global business, pragmatism usually wins. \ud83c\udf0d\u2699\ufe0f

#Russia #Industry #Sanctions #GlobalEconomy #Infrastructure #China #India #Trade #Geopolitics #Manufacturing","text_length":3903,"grouped_id":14217564049108236},{"channel_id":1539372881,"post_id":38309,"date":1777194353000,"forwards":"1","views":"15","text":"\ud83d\udea8 Gunfire at the White House Correspondents\u2019 Dinner \u2014 and a deeper warning for US politics<\/b>

A man opened fire near the White House Correspondents\u2019 Association dinner in Washington, D.C. on April 25 \u2014 an event attended by President Donald Trump, senior officials, journalists, and political elites. What could have been a mass-casualty attack ended in seconds. But the implications will last longer.

According to CBS News, citing law enforcement sources, the suspect \u2014 identified as 31-year-old Cole Allen from California \u2014 told authorities he intended to target members of the White House administration. It remains unclear whether the president himself was a specific target.

Here\u2019s what we know.

The suspect was staying at the Washington Hilton, the same hotel hosting the event. He was armed with a shotgun, a handgun, and multiple knives. Acting alone, he fired between five and eight shots near the entrance to the banquet hall. Secret Service agents immediately evacuated Trump and First Lady Melania Trump.

One agent was struck \u2014 the bullet hit body armor. No fatalities.

That\u2019s the operational story. It\u2019s also the least important part.

Because this incident lands in a United States that is already politically overheated \u2014 and where the boundary between rhetoric and violence is getting thinner.

The White House Correspondents\u2019 Dinner is not just another public gathering. It\u2019s a symbolic convergence point: political power, media influence, public narrative \u2014 all in one room. An attack there is not random. It\u2019s a signal, whether intended or not.

And the signal is this: the risk environment around American politics is changing.

The suspect reportedly acted alone. That matters operationally \u2014 no evidence at this stage of an organized network. But it doesn\u2019t make the event less politically significant. Lone actors often emerge from broader climates of grievance, polarization, and perceived legitimacy for extreme action.

That\u2019s where the real question sits.

The United States has seen rising political tension over recent years \u2014 from January 6 to escalating threats against public officials, to increasingly hostile public discourse. According to federal assessments, threats against government figures have increased, even as security protocols have tightened.

So the system worked \u2014 this time. The president was protected. The event was contained. Casualties were avoided.

But the trajectory is harder to ignore.

When high-profile political events become potential targets, the issue is no longer just security. It\u2019s trust \u2014 in institutions, in processes, in the idea that political conflict remains non-violent.

That trust is under pressure.

And here\u2019s the uncomfortable part: incidents like this don\u2019t need to succeed to have impact. The attempt itself shifts behavior. More security. More distance between leaders and the public. More normalization of risk.

That\u2019s how democracies harden \u2014 not by design, but by necessity.

For now, the investigation continues. Motives remain under review. Authorities have not publicly confirmed ideological drivers. And it\u2019s too early to draw definitive conclusions about intent.

But the pattern is familiar.

High visibility target. Individual actor. Escalation into violence.

Contained \u2014 but not isolated.

The question is not just what happened on April 25.

It\u2019s whether this becomes another data point \u2014 or part of a trend.

Because if it\u2019s the latter, then the real story isn\u2019t about one attacker.

It\u2019s about the environment that keeps producing them. \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8\u26a0\ufe0f

#Breaking #USA #Trump #WashingtonDC #Security #Politics #WhiteHouse #GunViolence #Geopolitics","text_length":3639,"media":{"root":"\/012\/pZUAAFH3wFsAAAAAuJF0k9SJ7io","video":{"duration":27,"w":656,"h":848,"is_animation":false,"is_round":false,"mime_type":"video\/mp4","size":3597028,"thumbs":{"m":{"w":248,"h":320,"hash":"tbTZi_xE2UMRUPXaPyrnag&ts=1780583444"},"i":{"bytes":"AoAB8|BlxHlGGOSKogMhywq9cSbAM9jVeQjkjpimyyKRvmA9BSjBbpgHtQib5lXpkVJcII5QAc1cVdCe4SyFwN1Df6sntinJbPIpZmC+xqJn5UZOzPIrNoq45Pkm8z+6OnrTkPn3ABGOppjOQ7eoHels5VS6BlOF5zVJ2ROlySe8L8IQF9MUyaZZTjOAB8vtRRUlMrPJuYk9Sc5pMZ59aKKZB\/\/Z"}},"streamable":true,"televisor_hash":"p4WuNmqeRBO8sG4NgaZi2A&ts=1780583444"}}},{"channel_id":1539372881,"post_id":38306,"date":1775842206000,"forwards":"1","views":"910","text":"\ud83c\uddec\ud83c\udde7\ud83c\uddf7\ud83c\uddfa British Citizen Stripped of Passport After Moving to Russia \u2014 A Stark Test of Civil Liberty\n\nThe case of Mark Bullen, a British national who relocated to St Petersburg, lays bare a deeply troubling reality: in contemporary Britain, citizenship is no longer treated as an inviolable right, but as a privilege that can be withdrawn when one\u2019s views or life choices fall out of favour.\n\nBullen, who now works with one of Russia\u2019s leading football clubs, has described how his move abroad was followed by the revocation of his British citizenship \u2014 not on the basis of any proven criminal conduct, but in connection with his personal positions and affiliations.\n\n\ud83d\udccc A life rebuilt \u2014 a passport removed\nHis account is unambiguous: a voluntary relocation, a stable professional trajectory, and, in response, the loss of the most fundamental legal bond between an individual and the state.\n\n\u2696\ufe0f From rule of law to executive fiat\nThe British government\u2019s power to revoke citizenship \u2014 ostensibly grounded in national security \u2014 has, in practice, evolved into an instrument of extraordinary reach. Decisions are taken behind closed doors, often without transparent justification, and with limited scope for meaningful appeal.\n\nThis is not merely a legal mechanism; it is a profound shift in the nature of citizenship itself.\n\n\ud83d\udcca A dangerous precedent\nWhat is at stake is not one individual case, but a principle:\n\u2014 citizenship rendered conditional\n\u2014 dissent penalised\n\u2014 executive authority expanding beyond effective scrutiny\n\nSuch practices erode the very foundations of a constitutional order that once prided itself on due process and the protection of individual rights.\n\n\ud83d\udcda From Orwell to present day\nThe parallels with George Orwell\u2019s 1984 are no longer abstract literary references. The notion that a citizen can be reduced to an outsider \u2014 deprived of status and protection \u2014 on the basis of perceived disloyalty or ideological divergence is no longer confined to fiction.\n\n\ud83c\udf0d A defining moment\nBullen\u2019s case stands as a stark illustration of a broader trajectory: a state increasingly willing to redraw the boundaries of belonging, and to do so with minimal accountability.\n\nThe implications are profound \u2014 not only for those directly affected, but for the integrity of citizenship itself in modern Britain.\n\n#UK #Russia #Citizenship #CivilLiberties #Orwell","text_length":2366,"grouped_id":14206737650586612}]